<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tom O'Keefe (TOKiBiz)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomokeefe.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomokeefe.com</link>
	<description>Creating Ideas Into Business</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on HomeAway Raises $250 Million by Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/11/homeaway-raises-250-million/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1175#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Terrific feedback Guy - thank you for your comment.  I always prefer renting by-owner and when (and if) I make it to Keystone, Colorado I'll look at your place.

All the best,

Tom O'Keefe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific feedback Guy - thank you for your comment.  I always prefer renting by-owner and when (and if) I make it to Keystone, Colorado I&#8217;ll look at your place.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Tom O&#8217;Keefe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.No More? From Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 by Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/16/web-2no-more-from-web-20-to-web-30/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1172#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Great feedback Derek!  Thank you for the comment.

Tom O'Keefe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great feedback Derek!  Thank you for the comment.</p>
<p>Tom O&#8217;Keefe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HomeAway Raises $250 Million by Guy Schlacter</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/11/homeaway-raises-250-million/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Schlacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1175#comment-807</guid>
		<description>This is an Interesting topic and I wanted to reflect more on the growth side of the by-owner vacation condo / lodging rental market.

I have been on both sides of the by-owner transaction having rented many condos for my family’s vacations from their owners and visa versa as the owner of a Keystone Resort condo rental in Keystone Colorado (Summit County.)   The general public has a growing appreciation for the value of both the actual rental units as well as the unique owner’s perspective that is often shared during the reservation process.  This unique owner’s perspective gives the prospective guests much deeper insight into the vacation or destination area’s attractions, local’s favorites, and other tips to make their vacation a greater experience. 

I know that often when I as the condo owner speak with guests, they appreciate the extra insight into different logistics, discounts, shopping, directions, etc, not to mention the extra conveniences of having this information ahead of time to reduce vacation expenses especially in these economic times.  

So the by-owner vacation value is much deeper than the value of the actual condo rental (lodging rental)  size / cost per night – it extends intricately into the rest of their vacation experience.   I and other owners certainly hope that more people will recognize these extras and continue to help the by-owner vacation rentals flourish.  We hope that their feedback makes it to the big corporations like HomeAway and not strictly move to automated transactions that would strip these extra personal touches that would be lost.  

-Guy  Schlacter (gschlact)
www.GreatRentalKeystone.com
click for info:  
&lt;a href="http://www.GreatrentalKeystone.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Keytone condo rental for your vacation - http://www.GreatRentalKeystone.com&lt;/a&gt; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an Interesting topic and I wanted to reflect more on the growth side of the by-owner vacation condo / lodging rental market.</p>
<p>I have been on both sides of the by-owner transaction having rented many condos for my family’s vacations from their owners and visa versa as the owner of a Keystone Resort condo rental in Keystone Colorado (Summit County.)   The general public has a growing appreciation for the value of both the actual rental units as well as the unique owner’s perspective that is often shared during the reservation process.  This unique owner’s perspective gives the prospective guests much deeper insight into the vacation or destination area’s attractions, local’s favorites, and other tips to make their vacation a greater experience. </p>
<p>I know that often when I as the condo owner speak with guests, they appreciate the extra insight into different logistics, discounts, shopping, directions, etc, not to mention the extra conveniences of having this information ahead of time to reduce vacation expenses especially in these economic times.  </p>
<p>So the by-owner vacation value is much deeper than the value of the actual condo rental (lodging rental)  size / cost per night – it extends intricately into the rest of their vacation experience.   I and other owners certainly hope that more people will recognize these extras and continue to help the by-owner vacation rentals flourish.  We hope that their feedback makes it to the big corporations like HomeAway and not strictly move to automated transactions that would strip these extra personal touches that would be lost.  </p>
<p>-Guy  Schlacter (gschlact)<br />
<a href="http://www.GreatRentalKeystone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GreatRentalKeystone.com</a><br />
click for info:<br />
<a href="http://www.GreatrentalKeystone.com" rel="nofollow">Keytone condo rental for your vacation - </a><a href="http://www.GreatRentalKeystone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GreatRentalKeystone.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.No More? From Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 by Derek Forrest</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/16/web-2no-more-from-web-20-to-web-30/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1172#comment-806</guid>
		<description>With companies having less money to invest in technology, it would seem to me that Web 3.0 may take longer to arrive.  I agree that it is in their best interest to look towards technology to improve all aspects of their business from customer service to marketing to internal operations…  On the other hand, if there is technology available that can help companies cut cost then they will adopt it immediately.  I wonder, however, if the capital is available for this technology to be developed since investors are holding onto their cash.  You may be a 100% right so I appreciate the blog post - great topic.  thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With companies having less money to invest in technology, it would seem to me that Web 3.0 may take longer to arrive.  I agree that it is in their best interest to look towards technology to improve all aspects of their business from customer service to marketing to internal operations…  On the other hand, if there is technology available that can help companies cut cost then they will adopt it immediately.  I wonder, however, if the capital is available for this technology to be developed since investors are holding onto their cash.  You may be a 100% right so I appreciate the blog post - great topic.  thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Energy Technology by Web 2.No More? From Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 &#171; Tom O&#8217;Keefe (TOKiBiz)</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/10/energy-technology/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.No More? From Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 &#171; Tom O&#8217;Keefe (TOKiBiz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-805</guid>
		<description>[...] tools of Web 2.0 will evolve to help all nations be self sufficient, energy independent (via new energy technology) and environmentally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tools of Web 2.0 will evolve to help all nations be self sufficient, energy independent (via new energy technology) and environmentally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube Sponsored Videos by Stop Wasting Money with Adwords</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/13/youtube-sponsored-videos/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Wasting Money with Adwords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1195#comment-797</guid>
		<description>I think it’s time for Adwords to start integrating videos within their text ads. 

&#62;&#62; This is already the case but I assume the price to pay (from hiring a designer to make it funny and cute + Google bid) makes it not affordable to all advertisers.

If you select text &#38; images to be displayed in your  Adsense ads you can sometimes get a video ad. Not really sure but I suppose it depends on your traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s time for Adwords to start integrating videos within their text ads. </p>
<p>&gt;&gt; This is already the case but I assume the price to pay (from hiring a designer to make it funny and cute + Google bid) makes it not affordable to all advertisers.</p>
<p>If you select text &amp; images to be displayed in your  Adsense ads you can sometimes get a video ad. Not really sure but I suppose it depends on your traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Advertising Spending by YouTube Sponsored Videos &#171; Tom O&#8217;Keefe (TOKiBiz)</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/31/online-advertising-spending/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Sponsored Videos &#171; Tom O&#8217;Keefe (TOKiBiz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1001#comment-795</guid>
		<description>[...] All in all it&#8217;s a good start for YouTube and I would imagine it&#8217;s an idea that Google has been contemplating releasing for many months. Mainly because it&#8217;s not a new idea and the economy probably forced Google to release sponsored videos sooner than later to make up for a likely decline in online advertising spending. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All in all it&#8217;s a good start for YouTube and I would imagine it&#8217;s an idea that Google has been contemplating releasing for many months. Mainly because it&#8217;s not a new idea and the economy probably forced Google to release sponsored videos sooner than later to make up for a likely decline in online advertising spending. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Adsense or Advertising Model? by Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/01/google-adsense-or-advertising-model/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-794</guid>
		<description>I think initially to $0.05 EPV but we'll see how the economy trickles down to Adsense.  It could be lower but there are two sides of thought as to whether online (more accountable) advertising will increase or decrease during the current conditions.

TOK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think initially to $0.05 EPV but we&#8217;ll see how the economy trickles down to Adsense.  It could be lower but there are two sides of thought as to whether online (more accountable) advertising will increase or decrease during the current conditions.</p>
<p>TOK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Adsense or Advertising Model? by Sam Jones</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/01/google-adsense-or-advertising-model/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-792</guid>
		<description>You said "I actually think the Adsense EPV ($0.07) is a bit high and it will come down with more data".

Where would you peg the actual number at if you were to guess?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said &#8220;I actually think the Adsense EPV ($0.07) is a bit high and it will come down with more data&#8221;.</p>
<p>Where would you peg the actual number at if you were to guess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creating Ideas Into Business by It&#8217;s All About Execution &#171; Tom O&#8217;Keefe (TOKiBiz)</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/03/19/creating-ideas-into-business/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s All About Execution &#171; Tom O&#8217;Keefe (TOKiBiz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomokeefe.com/?p=215#comment-791</guid>
		<description>[...] About&#160;Execution  Posted on November 11, 2008 by Tom OKeefe   As I wrote previously in &#8220;Creating Ideas Into Business&#8221; I talked about how TOKiBiz helps entrepreneurs execute their idea into an online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About&nbsp;Execution  Posted on November 11, 2008 by Tom OKeefe   As I wrote previously in &#8220;Creating Ideas Into Business&#8221; I talked about how TOKiBiz helps entrepreneurs execute their idea into an online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Value of A Business Idea by .: H.E.N.U.S.A :.</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/07/09/the-value-of-a-business-idea/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>.: H.E.N.U.S.A :.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=370#comment-788</guid>
		<description>A very good idea just you posted. I'm going to translate tghis post to Bahasa Indonesia for a good resources to our visior. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good idea just you posted. I&#8217;m going to translate tghis post to Bahasa Indonesia for a good resources to our visior. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monetizing YouTube by Twowan</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/06/04/monetizing-youtube/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Twowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-773</guid>
		<description>To make money with YouTube, this is what Google has to do... 

On the most viewed clips (clips with, let say, already 1000 views) (doesn't matter who posted them) YouTube automatically implements a 5 seconds overlay ad that appears over the player and blocks out (darkens) everything else. (It gives a bit of time for the clip to load in the background as well). 

This overlay is a 5 seconds spot (can't be longer than that and it doesn't link to a company website if you click on it. It's like a really, really short TV spot. It can be a still picture for outfits with very little budgets...)

Now, people don't like ads... but they like GAMES and they like to COLLECT stuff. 

Each overlay ad is a mini 5 seconds GAME. You have three colored dots on the overlay. The viewer clicks on ONE of them. One is a winner, two are duds. If you're lucky to pick the winner (you only have one chance) during the 5 secs, you receive a TOKEN that is automatically added to your YouTube account. (It encourages you to stay registered...)

Now, you COLLECT these tokens. If you win a certain number of similar tokens, you can EXCHANGE them against full-length HD Hollywood Films or TV shows on YouTube. The fun part could be that you have different categorires of tokens. (Some would be for specific film genres or just for one TV show and some could be really hard to find, worth maybe ten tokens, etc.) (Tokens are generated randomly by the system.)

Now, you have the problem of guys posting shows and seeing Google make money off their film. Well, they need to be rewarded too. For a succesful posting (ie lots of viewers) they also receive TOKENS... to be exchanged to watch high-quality HD movies or TV shows.

Now, these HD movies or TV shows in the "HD Theatre section of YouTube" can also be sponsored with a longer lead-in spot... That's even more money for Google.

Now, we have the problem of big brand names not wanting to have their spots stuck on "Jimmy and his weird cat"... Well, they could "control" where their 5 Secs. spots go by teaming with content suppliers through YouTube. Example, a Coca-Cola campaign with Viacom clips... Viacom takes all the succesful shows they own like, for example, "Spongebob". They cut out little "gems" (two to three minute clips) and they post them on YouTube to watch for free... Viacom via Google sell their 5 second spots to Coca-cola. Everybody is happy. The viewer, who enjoys these mini-clips, can even link to the full episode of Spongebob on YouTube. He can pay by redeeming TOKENS or he can pay with real money for the full episode or combine both. (It's all streaming anyway! It's like TV a la carte.)

Now, what about the "Jim and his weird cat" clips. Who pays for these 5 secs ads? Well, it's like Google's Adsense, it's small outfits who purchase so many spots. You can buy a thousand spots or ten thousand spots to be randomly placed on clips or based on the clip's TAGS and on the clip's level of viewership. The outfit supplies the spot or the still and pays Google directly up front.

A system like this is not that difficult to implement. (If they're real smart, they can have it work just the same on imbedded videos on other sites) Anyway, it's fun for all involved and all get something out of it. Everybody is a winner especially Google who makes tons of money from the big guys but also... most importantly...from the long, long tail of all the little guys. Viewers are hooked to YouTube forever! Even if they're just there to click on ads and forget about the clips... the most important is done. Money!

Here, you have it.

Twowan,

(If Google wants more ideas like this one, they can contact me. I'm the guy behind laboratoryfilms.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To make money with YouTube, this is what Google has to do&#8230; </p>
<p>On the most viewed clips (clips with, let say, already 1000 views) (doesn&#8217;t matter who posted them) YouTube automatically implements a 5 seconds overlay ad that appears over the player and blocks out (darkens) everything else. (It gives a bit of time for the clip to load in the background as well). </p>
<p>This overlay is a 5 seconds spot (can&#8217;t be longer than that and it doesn&#8217;t link to a company website if you click on it. It&#8217;s like a really, really short TV spot. It can be a still picture for outfits with very little budgets&#8230;)</p>
<p>Now, people don&#8217;t like ads&#8230; but they like GAMES and they like to COLLECT stuff. </p>
<p>Each overlay ad is a mini 5 seconds GAME. You have three colored dots on the overlay. The viewer clicks on ONE of them. One is a winner, two are duds. If you&#8217;re lucky to pick the winner (you only have one chance) during the 5 secs, you receive a TOKEN that is automatically added to your YouTube account. (It encourages you to stay registered&#8230;)</p>
<p>Now, you COLLECT these tokens. If you win a certain number of similar tokens, you can EXCHANGE them against full-length HD Hollywood Films or TV shows on YouTube. The fun part could be that you have different categorires of tokens. (Some would be for specific film genres or just for one TV show and some could be really hard to find, worth maybe ten tokens, etc.) (Tokens are generated randomly by the system.)</p>
<p>Now, you have the problem of guys posting shows and seeing Google make money off their film. Well, they need to be rewarded too. For a succesful posting (ie lots of viewers) they also receive TOKENS&#8230; to be exchanged to watch high-quality HD movies or TV shows.</p>
<p>Now, these HD movies or TV shows in the &#8220;HD Theatre section of YouTube&#8221; can also be sponsored with a longer lead-in spot&#8230; That&#8217;s even more money for Google.</p>
<p>Now, we have the problem of big brand names not wanting to have their spots stuck on &#8220;Jimmy and his weird cat&#8221;&#8230; Well, they could &#8220;control&#8221; where their 5 Secs. spots go by teaming with content suppliers through YouTube. Example, a Coca-Cola campaign with Viacom clips&#8230; Viacom takes all the succesful shows they own like, for example, &#8220;Spongebob&#8221;. They cut out little &#8220;gems&#8221; (two to three minute clips) and they post them on YouTube to watch for free&#8230; Viacom via Google sell their 5 second spots to Coca-cola. Everybody is happy. The viewer, who enjoys these mini-clips, can even link to the full episode of Spongebob on YouTube. He can pay by redeeming TOKENS or he can pay with real money for the full episode or combine both. (It&#8217;s all streaming anyway! It&#8217;s like TV a la carte.)</p>
<p>Now, what about the &#8220;Jim and his weird cat&#8221; clips. Who pays for these 5 secs ads? Well, it&#8217;s like Google&#8217;s Adsense, it&#8217;s small outfits who purchase so many spots. You can buy a thousand spots or ten thousand spots to be randomly placed on clips or based on the clip&#8217;s TAGS and on the clip&#8217;s level of viewership. The outfit supplies the spot or the still and pays Google directly up front.</p>
<p>A system like this is not that difficult to implement. (If they&#8217;re real smart, they can have it work just the same on imbedded videos on other sites) Anyway, it&#8217;s fun for all involved and all get something out of it. Everybody is a winner especially Google who makes tons of money from the big guys but also&#8230; most importantly&#8230;from the long, long tail of all the little guys. Viewers are hooked to YouTube forever! Even if they&#8217;re just there to click on ads and forget about the clips&#8230; the most important is done. Money!</p>
<p>Here, you have it.</p>
<p>Twowan,</p>
<p>(If Google wants more ideas like this one, they can contact me. I&#8217;m the guy behind laboratoryfilms.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on President Barack Obama has Gone Viral by Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/06/president-barack-obama-has-gone-viral/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1134#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the find Alex!  There is indeed a big difference between 27 and 27 million - you &lt;a href="http://www.webnotes.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;Webnotes&lt;/a&gt; guys don't miss a thing!

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the find Alex!  There is indeed a big difference between 27 and 27 million - you <a href="http://www.webnotes.net" rel="nofollow">Webnotes</a> guys don&#8217;t miss a thing!</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on President Barack Obama has Gone Viral by Alex</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/06/president-barack-obama-has-gone-viral/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1134#comment-771</guid>
		<description>You should say "27 million unique visitors" instead of "27" :-)

Hope all is well! Glad to see InfoMed is chugging along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should say &#8220;27 million unique visitors&#8221; instead of &#8220;27&#8243; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hope all is well! Glad to see InfoMed is chugging along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Record Traffic on Election Day by President Barack Obama has Gone Viral &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/05/record-traffic-on-election-day/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>President Barack Obama has Gone Viral &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1072#comment-757</guid>
		<description>[...] views from major news websites like CNN, ABC News and MSNBC - all of which saw a massive spike on traffic on election day.  CNN.com alone had 27 unique visitors on election night with 276 million page views. Whether you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] views from major news websites like CNN, ABC News and MSNBC - all of which saw a massive spike on traffic on election day.  CNN.com alone had 27 unique visitors on election night with 276 million page views. Whether you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lung Cancer Prognosis by Lung cancer image &#124; Lung Cancer Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/05/lung-cancer-prognosis/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Lung cancer image &#124; Lung Cancer Reviewed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1096#comment-756</guid>
		<description>[...] Lung Cancer News&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lung Cancer News&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Evolution of a Web Design by Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/06/the-evolution-of-a-web-design/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1113#comment-755</guid>
		<description>Thank you Sally!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Sally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Evolution of a Web Design by Sally Hughes Doherty</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/06/the-evolution-of-a-web-design/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Hughes Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1113#comment-754</guid>
		<description>I think you made very good decisions.  Especially really like Bizak - very engaging design.

Good luck at Vencorps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you made very good decisions.  Especially really like Bizak - very engaging design.</p>
<p>Good luck at Vencorps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mashable&#8217;s Startup Showdown by Under the Radar - Dealmaker Media &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/01/mashables-startup-showdown/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Under the Radar - Dealmaker Media &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-745</guid>
		<description>[...] Under the Radar startup showdown sponsored by Dealmaker Media and hosted by VenCorps. Like Mashable&#8217;s Startup Showdown this too comes with a $50,000 investment.  VenCorps is an online community that provides human [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Under the Radar startup showdown sponsored by Dealmaker Media and hosted by VenCorps. Like Mashable&#8217;s Startup Showdown this too comes with a $50,000 investment.  VenCorps is an online community that provides human [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Startup by Tom OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/02/online-startup/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1019#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Mark,

You're referring to sites listed on Bizak under our public listings such as the ones at &lt;a href="http://www.bizak.com/industry/Internet" rel="nofollow"&gt;Internet Startup&lt;/a&gt;. You understand that I own Bizak but not the startups listed under bizak?  Bizak is a tool for all startups (regardless of revenue source, industry or type) to compute their valuation and connect with investors &#38; professionals.  As I've noted in previous articles, &lt;a href="http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/01/google-adsense-or-advertising-model/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google Adsense or Advertising Model&lt;/a&gt; &#38; &lt;a href="http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/26/startup-statistics-from-bizak/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Startup Statistics&lt;/a&gt;, 20% of the websites who contribute to Bizak rely on Google Adsense as their primary revenue source.  There are hundreds of startups on Bizak and I unfortunately don't own all of them which makes me a bit perplexed by your comment. Just because I'm not a proponent of Adsense doesn't mean others can't use it and that a select group of them can't have success from it. However, looking at the statistics on a whole startups only earn $0.07 EPV with Google Adsense - $0.10 below in house advertising and considerable less than other revenue sources.  Of all of the new projects that get pitched to me I never rely on Google Adsense, or even advertising, as the main source of revenue but other companies do and they use Bizak, which I thank them for their business. 

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re referring to sites listed on Bizak under our public listings such as the ones at <a href="http://www.bizak.com/industry/Internet" rel="nofollow">Internet Startup</a>. You understand that I own Bizak but not the startups listed under bizak?  Bizak is a tool for all startups (regardless of revenue source, industry or type) to compute their valuation and connect with investors &amp; professionals.  As I&#8217;ve noted in previous articles, <a href="http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/01/google-adsense-or-advertising-model/" rel="nofollow">Google Adsense or Advertising Model</a> &amp; <a href="http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/26/startup-statistics-from-bizak/" rel="nofollow">Startup Statistics</a>, 20% of the websites who contribute to Bizak rely on Google Adsense as their primary revenue source.  There are hundreds of startups on Bizak and I unfortunately don&#8217;t own all of them which makes me a bit perplexed by your comment. Just because I&#8217;m not a proponent of Adsense doesn&#8217;t mean others can&#8217;t use it and that a select group of them can&#8217;t have success from it. However, looking at the statistics on a whole startups only earn $0.07 EPV with Google Adsense - $0.10 below in house advertising and considerable less than other revenue sources.  Of all of the new projects that get pitched to me I never rely on Google Adsense, or even advertising, as the main source of revenue but other companies do and they use Bizak, which I thank them for their business. </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Startup by Mark</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/02/online-startup/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1019#comment-743</guid>
		<description>Bit dissappointed Tom - You have constantly said, and I agree with you, that Googe Adsense is not a business plan and yet I see lots of businesses on the site with Adsence as the  source of revenue - Whats happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit dissappointed Tom - You have constantly said, and I agree with you, that Googe Adsense is not a business plan and yet I see lots of businesses on the site with Adsence as the  source of revenue - Whats happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter Swamped on Election Day? by Record Traffic on Election Day &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/04/twitter-swamped-on-election-day/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Record Traffic on Election Day &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1041#comment-742</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s my guess that almost any site dealing with news or major communications saw record traffic yesterday - Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and the thousands that feed of them all likely set record traffic days. It&#8217;s also good to note that none of them had any substantial downtime. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s my guess that almost any site dealing with news or major communications saw record traffic yesterday - Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and the thousands that feed of them all likely set record traffic days. It&#8217;s also good to note that none of them had any substantial downtime. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Increase in EPV (Earnings per Visitor)? by Karl perera</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/04/02/an-increase-in-epv-earnings-per-visitor/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl perera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-741</guid>
		<description>A good post but really need more detailed info on how to increase my earnings per visitor on my content sites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good post but really need more detailed info on how to increase my earnings per visitor on my content sites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter Swamped on Election Day? by ZG</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/04/twitter-swamped-on-election-day/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>ZG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1041#comment-736</guid>
		<description>One cool way to sort through everything coming through twitter today is Tropicana's Freshly Squeezed Election Tweets, a twitter visualization:

http://anorangeamerica.com/

I've been working on the site with Tropicana, and we just launched it this morning.  It aggregates tweets real-time and creates a "bubble" proportional to each term's volume (analogous to a word cloud). It then draws connections between terms mentioned together.  It's addicting to play around with and watch it update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One cool way to sort through everything coming through twitter today is Tropicana&#8217;s Freshly Squeezed Election Tweets, a twitter visualization:</p>
<p><a href="http://anorangeamerica.com/" rel="nofollow">http://anorangeamerica.com/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been working on the site with Tropicana, and we just launched it this morning.  It aggregates tweets real-time and creates a &#8220;bubble&#8221; proportional to each term&#8217;s volume (analogous to a word cloud). It then draws connections between terms mentioned together.  It&#8217;s addicting to play around with and watch it update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1 Trillion URLs by 3 Billion Photos on Flickr &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/07/26/1-trillion-urls/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>3 Billion Photos on Flickr &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=472#comment-735</guid>
		<description>[...] me but the exponential growth of the internet is amazing. Combine the billions of photos with the 1 trillion URLs and the web is becoming a very difficult place to get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me but the exponential growth of the internet is amazing. Combine the billions of photos with the 1 trillion URLs and the web is becoming a very difficult place to get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Wins (the Online Campaign) by Evan</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/11/03/obama-wins-the-online-campaign/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1025#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the time lines that Capzles.com made for each candidate? they are pretty impressive to say the least. I think it is awesome how web savvy this election has became. It seems I can't even look at any page with out seeing something about this Presidential Election. 
http://www.capzles.com/ff8fc5bc-de7c-40ee-bdbf-71ca61e120b3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the time lines that Capzles.com made for each candidate? they are pretty impressive to say the least. I think it is awesome how web savvy this election has became. It seems I can&#8217;t even look at any page with out seeing something about this Presidential Election.<br />
<a href="http://www.capzles.com/ff8fc5bc-de7c-40ee-bdbf-71ca61e120b3" rel="nofollow">http://www.capzles.com/ff8fc5bc-de7c-40ee-bdbf-71ca61e120b3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Political Web:  Barack Obama vs. John McCain by Obama Wins (the Online Campaign) &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/06/24/the-political-web-barack-obama-vs-john-mccain/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Wins (the Online Campaign) &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=331#comment-729</guid>
		<description>[...]  Posted on November 3, 2008 by Tom OKeefe   Back in June I wrote an article called the Political Web which compared Barack Obama&#8217;s web analytics to that of John McCain&#8217;s.  Back then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Posted on November 3, 2008 by Tom OKeefe   Back in June I wrote an article called the Political Web which compared Barack Obama&#8217;s web analytics to that of John McCain&#8217;s.  Back then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Energy Technology by Patrick Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/10/energy-technology/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Why isn't everyone getting behind thorium nuclear?

Thorium could safely provide all of our domestic electrical energy requirements for several centuries.

This summarized Washington press release proves that someone is listening:

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) and Harry Reid (D-NV.) recently introduced legislation that would pave the way for thorium nuclear-fuel reactors in the United States. The Thorium Energy Independence and Security Act of 2008 would establish offices at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy to regulate domestic thorium nuclear power generation and oversee possible demonstrations of thorium nuclear fuel assemblies. Using thorium for nuclear power has a number of potential benefits over conventional uranium. As a resource, thorium is abundant in the U.S. and throughout the world. 

A thorium fuel rod would remain in the reactor about three times as long as conventional nuclear fuel, cutting the volume of spent nuclear fuel by as much as two-thirds. Also, thorium nuclear fuel would significantly reduce the possibility that weapons-grade material would result from the process. Finally, a thorium fuel cycle could be used to dispose of existing plutonium stockpiles, which is the national security goal. 

“Our nation has focused mostly on mixed oxide nuclear fuel cycles, and our regulatory structure reflects that,” Hatch said. “With the growing interest in thorium nuclear power in the world and in the U.S., it’s time we made sure our government has a regulatory infrastructure in place to accommodate this new generation of nuclear power.” Speaking about the bill, Bruce Blair, president of the World Security Institute said, “This legislation reflects an enlightened grasp of the importance of supporting nuclear power while suppressing nuclear proliferation.

“This bill is a giant step for the United States toward the development of a safe, secure and independent energy future,” said Jack Lifton, business development and corporate communications Director of Thorium Energy Inc. (www.ThoriumEnergy.com). Thorium Energy is a resource company that owns property in Lemhi Pass, Idaho, where it is generally believed that the largest veins of thorium-rich minerals in the world are located. Analysis of the deposits shows them to be either the highest grade or in the top tier of the highest grade known anywhere on Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t everyone getting behind thorium nuclear?</p>
<p>Thorium could safely provide all of our domestic electrical energy requirements for several centuries.</p>
<p>This summarized Washington press release proves that someone is listening:</p>
<p>Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) and Harry Reid (D-NV.) recently introduced legislation that would pave the way for thorium nuclear-fuel reactors in the United States. The Thorium Energy Independence and Security Act of 2008 would establish offices at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy to regulate domestic thorium nuclear power generation and oversee possible demonstrations of thorium nuclear fuel assemblies. Using thorium for nuclear power has a number of potential benefits over conventional uranium. As a resource, thorium is abundant in the U.S. and throughout the world. </p>
<p>A thorium fuel rod would remain in the reactor about three times as long as conventional nuclear fuel, cutting the volume of spent nuclear fuel by as much as two-thirds. Also, thorium nuclear fuel would significantly reduce the possibility that weapons-grade material would result from the process. Finally, a thorium fuel cycle could be used to dispose of existing plutonium stockpiles, which is the national security goal. </p>
<p>“Our nation has focused mostly on mixed oxide nuclear fuel cycles, and our regulatory structure reflects that,” Hatch said. “With the growing interest in thorium nuclear power in the world and in the U.S., it’s time we made sure our government has a regulatory infrastructure in place to accommodate this new generation of nuclear power.” Speaking about the bill, Bruce Blair, president of the World Security Institute said, “This legislation reflects an enlightened grasp of the importance of supporting nuclear power while suppressing nuclear proliferation.</p>
<p>“This bill is a giant step for the United States toward the development of a safe, secure and independent energy future,” said Jack Lifton, business development and corporate communications Director of Thorium Energy Inc. (www.ThoriumEnergy.com). Thorium Energy is a resource company that owns property in Lemhi Pass, Idaho, where it is generally believed that the largest veins of thorium-rich minerals in the world are located. Analysis of the deposits shows them to be either the highest grade or in the top tier of the highest grade known anywhere on Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Adsense &#38; the Economic Turmoil by Marketing Eficiente &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Advertising Spending</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/30/google-adsense-the-economic-turmoil/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Eficiente &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Advertising Spending</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=994#comment-724</guid>
		<description>[...] Muchas gracias por tu visita!  I received a great comment yesterday in response to my article, Google Adsense &#38; the Economic Turmoil, from Rick Breslin of Drive Thru Interactive.  Rick is the President of Drive Thru Interactive, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Muchas gracias por tu visita!  I received a great comment yesterday in response to my article, Google Adsense &#38; the Economic Turmoil, from Rick Breslin of Drive Thru Interactive.  Rick is the President of Drive Thru Interactive, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Advertising Spending by chintan</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/31/online-advertising-spending/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>chintan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1001#comment-723</guid>
		<description>hi, details are positive but can you specify the future of internet media as far as india and in india, about real estate segment is concern? why any builder would like to place advert on portal and how?what are the benefits apart like cost effective, measurable, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, details are positive but can you specify the future of internet media as far as india and in india, about real estate segment is concern? why any builder would like to place advert on portal and how?what are the benefits apart like cost effective, measurable, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Advertising Spending by Webrecsol Web</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/31/online-advertising-spending/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Webrecsol Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1001#comment-714</guid>
		<description>hi guys, your blog site site content information is very nice and  best details internet marketing so i think you feature provide a better information. keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi guys, your blog site site content information is very nice and  best details internet marketing so i think you feature provide a better information. keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Advertising Spending by Online Advertising Spending &#124; InteractiveMarketing</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/31/online-advertising-spending/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Advertising Spending &#124; InteractiveMarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=1001#comment-713</guid>
		<description>[...] more here:  Online Advertising Spending   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here:  Online Advertising Spending   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Adsense &#38; the Economic Turmoil by Online Advertising Spending &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/30/google-adsense-the-economic-turmoil/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Advertising Spending &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=994#comment-712</guid>
		<description>[...] on October 31, 2008 by Tom OKeefe   I received a great comment yesterday in response to my article, Google Adsense &#38; the Economic Turmoil, from Rick Breslin of Drive Thru Interactive.  Rick is the President of Drive Thru Interactive, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on October 31, 2008 by Tom OKeefe   I received a great comment yesterday in response to my article, Google Adsense &amp; the Economic Turmoil, from Rick Breslin of Drive Thru Interactive.  Rick is the President of Drive Thru Interactive, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Adsense &#38; the Economic Turmoil by Rick Breslin</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/30/google-adsense-the-economic-turmoil/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Breslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=994#comment-709</guid>
		<description>While I agree that advertising/marketing budgets will get cut within large corporations, this is actually the best time for small businesses to continue their marketing efforts.  Never stop marketing.  Ever.

In fact, we're seeing businesses (both big and small) trimming their advertising spend with traditional media (especially newspapers and magazines), while keeping or increasing their online advertising/marketing spend.  Why?  Online marketing is entirely measurable (and typically produces quicker ROI), and you don't have to lock-in to huge advertising contracts with old-school publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that advertising/marketing budgets will get cut within large corporations, this is actually the best time for small businesses to continue their marketing efforts.  Never stop marketing.  Ever.</p>
<p>In fact, we&#8217;re seeing businesses (both big and small) trimming their advertising spend with traditional media (especially newspapers and magazines), while keeping or increasing their online advertising/marketing spend.  Why?  Online marketing is entirely measurable (and typically produces quicker ROI), and you don&#8217;t have to lock-in to huge advertising contracts with old-school publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zoho Creator Online Database Application by MyTaskhelper</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2007/12/22/zoho-creator-online-database-application/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>MyTaskhelper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomokeefe.com/2007/12/22/zoho-creator-online-database-application/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>So it's a 2008 year...and you still programming the same comment/mailing list forms which saves your data in databases, then hosting/configuring database/servers? Why? All you need is to have online database, and interface to access to it/add data. http://www.mytaskhelper.com - it's a free online database, using which you can create and share online databases. Examples of forms is on the main page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s a 2008 year&#8230;and you still programming the same comment/mailing list forms which saves your data in databases, then hosting/configuring database/servers? Why? All you need is to have online database, and interface to access to it/add data. <a href="http://www.mytaskhelper.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytaskhelper.com</a> - it&#8217;s a free online database, using which you can create and share online databases. Examples of forms is on the main page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Money - Recent Venture Capital Deals by Eugene</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/22/big-money-recent-venture-capital-deals/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=978#comment-698</guid>
		<description>looking forward for more information about this. thanks for sharing. Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking forward for more information about this. thanks for sharing. Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Political Web:  Barack Obama vs. John McCain by US CTO Under the Obama Administration &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/06/24/the-political-web-barack-obama-vs-john-mccain/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>US CTO Under the Obama Administration &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=331#comment-696</guid>
		<description>[...] will likely focus on new energy technology like that of Tesla Motors. As I previously wrote in the Political Web it&#8217;s clear that Barack embraces technology and the CTO will likely be a critical role within [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will likely focus on new energy technology like that of Tesla Motors. As I previously wrote in the Political Web it&#8217;s clear that Barack embraces technology and the CTO will likely be a critical role within [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Technology Behind Tesla Motors by US CTO Under the Obama Administration &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/07/24/the-technology-behind-tesla-motors/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>US CTO Under the Obama Administration &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=419#comment-694</guid>
		<description>[...] in 10 years and to do this the CTO will likely focus on new energy technology like that of the Tesla Motors. As I previously wrote in the Political Web it&#8217;s clear that Barack embraces technology and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 10 years and to do this the CTO will likely focus on new energy technology like that of the Tesla Motors. As I previously wrote in the Political Web it&#8217;s clear that Barack embraces technology and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Energy Technology by US CTO Under the Obama Administration &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/10/energy-technology/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>US CTO Under the Obama Administration &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=711#comment-693</guid>
		<description>[...] the United States energy independent in 10 years and to do this the CTO will likely focus on new energy technology like that of the Tesla Motors. As I previously wrote in the Political Web it&#8217;s clear that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the United States energy independent in 10 years and to do this the CTO will likely focus on new energy technology like that of the Tesla Motors. As I previously wrote in the Political Web it&#8217;s clear that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bootstrapped by The Market &#38; Angel Investors &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/10/13/bootstrapped/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>The Market &#38; Angel Investors &#171; Internet &#124; Business &#124; Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=920#comment-690</guid>
		<description>[...] have to cost a lot of money to build and you DON&#8217;T have to use developers from overseas. By bootstrapping operations and finding the right developer, you can easily launch an impressive application for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have to cost a lot of money to build and you DON&#8217;T have to use developers from overseas. By bootstrapping operations and finding the right developer, you can easily launch an impressive application for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Will Eventually Become Ineffective by seo consultants</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/03/31/seo-will-eventually-become-inneffective/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>seo consultants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-683</guid>
		<description>I believe seo will be around 3 thousand years from now. Where there is a will there is a way, that is my belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe seo will be around 3 thousand years from now. Where there is a will there is a way, that is my belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media by Bootstrapped &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/media/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Bootstrapped &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomokeefe.com/?page_id=363#comment-677</guid>
		<description>[...] Media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adsense Has Become Worthless by Bootstrapped &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2007/12/14/adsense-has-become-worthless/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Bootstrapped &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomokeefe.com/2007/12/14/adsense-has-become-worthless/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>[...] (advertising, Google Adsense) then they might be forced to charge (micro-payments maybe) for it. Adsense was already becoming worthless and these recent events will likely make it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (advertising, Google Adsense) then they might be forced to charge (micro-payments maybe) for it. Adsense was already becoming worthless and these recent events will likely make it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Startup Statistics from Bizak by Bootstrapped &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/26/startup-statistics-from-bizak/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Bootstrapped &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=845#comment-673</guid>
		<description>[...] (or need) to bootstrap operations, be creative and run a more efficient business model. Based on Bizak&#8217;s startup statistics over 40% of websites rely on advertising to generate revenues. Today is a good day in the markets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (or need) to bootstrap operations, be creative and run a more efficient business model. Based on Bizak&#8217;s startup statistics over 40% of websites rely on advertising to generate revenues. Today is a good day in the markets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions? by Leon Pein</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/08/27/questions/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Pein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=651#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I wonder if you can advise even though this is not an internet idea. 

My idea is for repackaging a commonly available low-cost business product, putting it into smaller novelty packs that turn it into a kids or adults game/relaxation aid/boredom repellent.  It is simply a matter of repackaging in a novel way. I expect that it will be difficult to protect and it is certainly easy to copy. Please could you/ anyone guide me as to the financial worth of attempting protection.  My wife thinks the best route would be to negotiate a deal with a producer and games packager simultaneously. I agree, but the games packager could easily do it all themselves, so I need to know how to protect against that. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I wonder if you can advise even though this is not an internet idea. </p>
<p>My idea is for repackaging a commonly available low-cost business product, putting it into smaller novelty packs that turn it into a kids or adults game/relaxation aid/boredom repellent.  It is simply a matter of repackaging in a novel way. I expect that it will be difficult to protect and it is certainly easy to copy. Please could you/ anyone guide me as to the financial worth of attempting protection.  My wife thinks the best route would be to negotiate a deal with a producer and games packager simultaneously. I agree, but the games packager could easily do it all themselves, so I need to know how to protect against that. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting An Idea Off the Ground by And the Winner is&#8230;? &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/08/13/getting-an-idea-off-the-ground/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>And the Winner is&#8230;? &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=547#comment-646</guid>
		<description>[...] Getting an Idea Off the Ground [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Getting an Idea Off the Ground [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mashable&#8217;s Startup Showdown by And the Winner is&#8230;? &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/09/01/mashables-startup-showdown/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>And the Winner is&#8230;? &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=692#comment-644</guid>
		<description>[...] If you don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about please read Mashable&#8217;s Startup Showdown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about please read Mashable&#8217;s Startup Showdown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visual Thesaurus by Recent Links Tagged With "thesaurus" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/08/28/visual-thesaurus/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "thesaurus" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=661#comment-633</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &#62;&#62; thesaurus   Visual Thesaurus Saved by cleversimon on Sun 28-9-2008   Comment on Gujarati Dictionary, Thesaurus and more by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; thesaurus   Visual Thesaurus Saved by cleversimon on Sun 28-9-2008   Comment on Gujarati Dictionary, Thesaurus and more by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Revenue Sources by Startup Statistics from Bizak &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/05/28/revenue-sources/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Startup Statistics from Bizak &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-630</guid>
		<description>[...] Sales (20%), Consulting Fees (17%), and Subscriptions (11%).  Back in May I also highlighted the top revenue sources on Bizak and it&#8217;s good to see with more data that Google Adsense has decreased significantly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sales (20%), Consulting Fees (17%), and Subscriptions (11%).  Back in May I also highlighted the top revenue sources on Bizak and it&#8217;s good to see with more data that Google Adsense has decreased significantly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free or Not Free? by Startup Statistics from Bizak &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</title>
		<link>http://tomokeefe.com/2008/04/09/free-or-not-free/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Startup Statistics from Bizak &#171; Internet. Business. Ideas&#8230;Tom O&#8217;Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seobr.wordpress.com/?p=226#comment-629</guid>
		<description>[...] integrate a subscription model with corporate services.  Deciding whether to offer services for Free or Not Free are usually the deciding factors between a subscription or advertising model and whether [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] integrate a subscription model with corporate services.  Deciding whether to offer services for Free or Not Free are usually the deciding factors between a subscription or advertising model and whether [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
